Click to edit Master title style,Click to edit Master text styles,Second level,Third level,Fourth level,Fifth level,1/31/2013,#,Ethics:,Throwing in the Kitchen Sink,How Far Can You Go in Presenting Damages,in Litigation,Mediation,and,Negotiation?,PRESENTERS:,Kirsten K.DavisPatrick Poff,Stetson University College of LawTrenam Kemker,Gulfport,FloridaTampa,Florida,American Bar Association,Forum on the Construction Industry,2021 Mid Winter Meeting,Introduction,Claiming damages and defending damage claims,Involves all aspects of practice,Involves the ethics of truth-telling,Five scenarios to test your understanding,Scenario 1,In a demand letter to opposing counsel seeking damages on a disputed construction project,a lawyer,(1)exaggerates damages to leverage settlement and,(2)although no law allows for attorneys fees,threatens to seek fees if forced to sue.,Has the lawyer acted unethically?,Question 1:Has the lawyer acted unethically?,Yes regarding the damages.,Yes regarding the attorneys fees.,Yes regarding both.,No regarding both.,Telling the Truth Before litigation begins,Model Rule 4.1:no misstatements of material fact or law,Puffing v.untruthful exaggerating,“Misusing the law,Relying on client representations,Scenario 2,In a dispute over unforeseen conditions,a contractor misrepresented facts to his lawyer about his actual knowledge of the unforeseen conditions prior to contract.,Lawyer relied upon these misrepresentations in negotiation,stated them as fact in the settlement agreement,and tendered the agreement to opposing counsel for signature.,Contractors lawyer subsequently discovered the dishonesty;when confronted,contractor refused to rectify the matter.,As an ethical matter,what must the lawyer do?,Question 2:As An ethical matter,what must the lawyer do?,Immediately contact opposing counsel and correct the misstatement.,Immediately contact opposing counsel and correct the misstatement if the clients acts amount to committing a crime or fraud.,Withdraw and disaffirm the settlement agreement.,Nothing.The duty of client confidentiality precludes any disclosures.,Correcting client statements before litigation begins,Model Rule 4.1,duty to disclose material fact to avoid assisting crime or fraud,unless there is,no,exception to duty of confidentiality,Other misrepresentations under state law,Scenario 3,A lawyer files a lien foreclosure action and attaches as an exhibit a claim of lien prepared and executed by the attorney on behalf of contractor-client that contains non-lienable damages.,Has the lawyer acted unethically?,Question 3:HAS The Lawyer Acted Unethically?,Yes,assuming the lawyer knew of the non-lienable damages before filing.,No if the pleadings have not yet been reviewed by the court.,No because the lawyer can rely on the clients sworn claim of lien to protect her from an ethical violation.,Representations in Pleadings,Model Rules 3.1&3.3,Cannot misstate fact or law,Cannot make frivolous claims,Must take“reasonable remedial measures,May have duty to correct,Other construction-specific scenarios,Scenario 4,Lawyers client is being deposed.,When opposing counsel asks about the value of damages stated in the claim for lien,the client knowingly misstates material facts about those damages.,Lawyer knows the client has misrepresented material facts but does not correct the clients statement or persuade the client to correct the statement.,Has the lawyer acted unethically?,Question 4:HAS The Lawyer Acted Unethically?,Yes.,No because the lawyer owes a duty of confidentiality to the client during a deposition.,No because the duty to zealously represent the client precludes the lawyer from revealing the information.,Statements in Court-Related Proceedings,Model Rule 3.3,Duty to correct false statements to tribunal,Duty of confidentiality does not protect,What are“tribunals?,Scenario 5,In the same litigation as Scenario 4,the court has ordered the parties to participate in mediation.,Before the mediator and opposing counsel,the lawyer states,“My client will not under any circumstances take less than$100,000 in settlement.,The lawyer knows,however,that the client will accept as little as$50,000.,Has the lawyer acted unethically?,Question 5:HAS The Lawyer Acted Unethically?,Yes because this is a misstatement of material fact.,Yes because this is court-ordered mediation;it were not court-ordered,this would be acceptable.,No because misstating the bottom line is acceptable in mediation.,Statements in Mediation,Model Rule 4.1,Cannot make a material misstatement of fact or law,But“puffing permissible,Model Rule 3.3 might apply to judges as mediators,Conclusion,Model Rule 4.1Statements to Others,No misstatements of material fact or law,Limited duty to correct client misstatements,Cannot assist crime or fraud,But common negotiation practices permissible,Generally applies to negotiation and most mediation,Conclusion,Model Rule 3.3Statements to Tribunals,No misstatements of fact or law,No false evidence,Duty to remedia